Education Forums
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
amoram
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:02 pm Post subject: The "purification" in the E=mc^2 will bring to c^2=9, and ti |
 |
|
Dear attentive scientist, keen on the Physics Research,
any who
searches gold, is glad when finds a pure sign of gold in a immense
river... The gold that the New Italic School of Epistemology,
searching and purifying the physical matter, has found, is even the
PHYSICS UNIFICATION.
Now I really hope that you don't throw away - suddenly - all this
river of our researches, only for distrust or... as soon as you'll
believe that its sand is not "all made of gold"... if you really
search a new start for yourselves!
The Purified Physics will soon allow the perfect calculus of the 2
necessary Forces (of magnetism and pressure) to realize the Atomic
Fusion.
Please, let you read! If you don't believe that our result was
possible, let you search in it at least a new starting for your
research!
The N.I.S. needs it at most, because nobody knows its work, and asks
modestly the help for reaching together this goal
A new start for your researches can happen, already, simply "noting
the lack of purity" existing today in the application of the
Einstein's General Relativity.
While Einstein needed an "absolute" speed as c in E = mc^2..., and
while by "pure" Principle the "absolute" in Physics is what is "not
dependent on - or relative to - anything else"..., the "light speed"
hasn't this "absolute" condition... if Physics respects this "pure"
Principe about "its absolute". In fact it is dependent on - and
relative to - the real electromagnetic front, that speed being
certainly of a flow of a volume... but this front, or section, is
lacking!
If Physics respects the "purity" in E=mc^2, how could m (a mass that
has its volume) be accelerated... not how a speed of "volume"? The
"pure" light speed isn't speed of volume lacking its electromagnetic
front! In our N.I.S. calculations, its 299 792 458 m s^-1 results to
be, at 10^-8 m^2 unitary dimension, the movement of the front big
1.0006922855944561487267301434248, for 1 m^3 s^-1 of flow, flow of the
"pure" its existence... and the speed in line is clearly of 3/1 m
s^-1, when it is "flow of volume", and not only the "undefined" speed
299 792 458 m s^-1, even if it is always invariant!
In Mathematics an "absolute" quantity hasn't the algebraic sign of a
Vector of real speed, so also in Mathematics the 299 792 458 m/s in a
direction, of the light speed, isn't an "absolute" mathematical
quantity, if Physics respects the mathematical "purity" in the D.M.S.
(decimal metric system) of the SI units. If the "purity" imposes the
volume's flow, 3 m^3 s^-1 is a "pure" math quantity of existence,
divided in 1 s of duration, and it is not a vector!
The SI units have the 10 cycle as the common unit of its decimal
units, so its "only invariant number" is 9, if the Physics respects
the "purity" of the D.M.S. of the SI. Its "purity" shows the 1 mass
falling of 9, or the 9 energy falling of 1. 1 and 9 are reciprocal
numbers, in the cycle 10. 1+9=10, or 10-9=1. The first expands 1 to 10
through +9 spaces, the second amasses 10 in 1 through -9 spaces. +9 an
-9 are all the "imposed" movement's energies, "imposed as fundament"
by the D.M.S. of the SI units.
The lack of UNIFICATION - finally - seems the lack of "purity"
consisting just in the "violation" of this 9 invariant number of the
D.M.S., when are adopted, at its "due" place, 2 different numbers of
units... in the same electromagnetism: A) 8.98755... in 10^16 m^2 s^-2
for the expanded c^2 mass B) 9,10938754 in 10^-31 kg for the amassed
electron's mass..., where the "purity" imposes that a "number of mass"
is not dependent on its form: diffused or amassed. Afterwards, adopted
involuntarily 2 different "numbers", - strangely - it is more than 100
years that the Physics asks in vain "why" there is not unity! And it
tries an "impossible" real connection between the forces! It is
impossible to reach, when we have introduced 2 "inverse mistakes",
introducing not "pure Forces", but 2 different "space/time Moments":
one negative in the full light expansion (what lacks to 3, in
2.99792...), and one positive in the full amassing of the light (what
is more than 9, in the 9.198389754 of the electron).
It is a question of "purity" that the "unit" represents everything.
So, being 1 m^3 the unit of the volume, amassed in 3 directions, it is
3 m^3 simultaneously amassed in 1, that are passing in the existence's
time as 3 m^3 s^-1, having the speed in line of 3 m s^-1, that becomes
exactly the "absolute" 3×10^8 m s^-1 when the section is of 10^-8 m^2
(that unitary of the candela, the unitary intensity of the light of
the SI). So only the "ideal purity" approaches the "know-how", and we
understand because, in s^-1, we don't perceive 300 000 000 m, but 299
792 458 m.
We have a front wider than the Å^2 10^12 = m^2 10^-8 of the candela;
the real front is 1.000692285594...×10^-8 m^2. There is certainly a
space/time Moment (equal to the precise part exceeding 1 candela),
that gets in "properly" the "moment's worth", that is the "real
duration" of our perceived "moment of space-time". The lacking 207.542
m (in 300 000 000 m), are certainly put as "the time", in an only
"virtual and imaginary" section (of our mind), to place after the
presence and to really scatter (all what exists only simultaneously)
in the light's time perception of the time-present mass. We have the
PROOFS, of this system to act of our intelligence, to live a life
having same duration and not... all together. It's necessary the
scattered time in every "music".
SO THIS IS OUR THESIS.
In E = mc^2 the lack of Unification depends on the "lack of purity" :
1) about the "Absolute" speed of the electromagnetic volume; 2) about
the Atomic Forces of its masses. The first isn't "pure" in a
"measured" speed, but it is the linear definition of the mass
"present" in a volume, indirectly already assumed with 1 m and 1 kg
related to the Earth mass. The second is the "Force of the mass" and
not the "Moment of its Force", that today is exchanged for a "pure"
Force.
AN THIS IS OUR SYNTHESIS
PURIFICATION OF THE c^2. The "absolute" speed of the electromagnetism
was indirectly fixed in 3×10^8 m/s BY DEFINITION, when 1 m was defined
as the 10^-7 of 1/4 of the Earth Meridian, and as the cycle of 10
decimal unitary masses put in sequence. In that precise moment the
space of 3/4 of the Meridian's length was 3×10^7 m long, and the 10
cycle of this present mass was necessarily of 3×10^8 m/s. Since the
unit in the SI is the 10 cycle, this absolute speed isn't 3/1 m/s (but
10^8 times bigger) only by the m imposed as 10^-8 of the cycle of the
unitary mass. When there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, the
c^2 measured with this m is necessarily the absolute 9 m^2 s^-2 that
must be ×10^16 times... because the m dimension's definition!
PURIFICATION OF THE ATOMIC MASS. Again according to the initial
definitions, when m 1/10 is the length of the side of the unitary mass
of 1 dm^3 of water, and its unitary cycle is that of the 10 dm of 1 m,
the most fall of 1 dm^3 of water (occupying 1 dm in height in the 10
dm of its dynamic cycle in height) is certainly of 9 dm, and certainly
the energy is 9 (as how 9 kg fallen of 1, as how 1 kg fallen of 9). It
is correct, having the same number 9 of the energy of the absolute
expansion 9, were there is equivalence between energy and mass.
Therefore, when there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, 9 is the
most unitary free energy, or the most free mass. Since 9,109389754
×10^-31 kg is the unitary mass of the free electron, and 9,109389754
is more than 9, it isn't the PURE FORCE of the mass, but probably it
is the Moment of its Force. How 60° measured to the Sun aren't the
Sun's Temperature (since the incidence of the space)... so 9,109389754
×10^-31 kg isn't the electron mass (since the incidence of the atomic
space). The space/time acts as in the macro, as in the micro of the
dimension. If the result of a balancing shows always this "moment", it
is always a "moment" and never becomes a "pure" Force.
Purifying the Forces of the masses, we have seen how all the physical
constants, at the same dimensions, assume the worthies of pure ratios,
in their number.
(Only for example: c is 3/1=3; c^2 is 3×3=9; Planck constant is 400/
(3+3)=66.6666...; Plank mass is 3×7=21; Planck time is (3×3)×(3+3)=54;
a.m.u. is 100/(3+3)=16.666...; electron mass in kg is 3×3=9; electron
mass in a.m.u. is 0.009/(16.6666...)=0.00054, or 540 (the candela's
number)/10^6=0.00054; electron mass in MeV is 54 -2(of MeV front)=52;
electron corpuscle in a.m.u. is 0,00054/3=0,00018; electron radius is
54/18=3; electron Volt and electric charge are 2^4=16; Avogadro's
number is 6=the Log of (10^10):(10^4); fine structure is the Log of
(10^100)×[10^-(3^3)]=73; Boltzman constant is (10^4)/
(73-1)=138.8888...; molar constant of gasses is 100/12=8,3333...;
Rydberg constant is 10/(0,90 periodic)=11, molar volume of an ideal
gas is 10/(0.45 periodic)=22, Faraday constant is (2^4)^6=96, etc.).
THIS WILL SOON OPEN TO ATOMIC FUSION. Cut away in all the atomic
masses what today is only the "Moment of the Force", and obtained the
PURITY of the FORCES, finally the Physics is unified an can do the
perfect calculus of the Forces to UNIFY also two hydrogen's atoms.
Finally it'll be possible until the real calculus of the true Force
(of magnetism and pressure) to compel - by magnetism - the lining up
of all the rotation's axes of the electron orbital planes, and - by
pressure - the penetration of two orbital planes made relatively
motionless because rotating at the same angular speed. Finally we'll
have the atomic fusion possibility obtained by the PURE calculus of
the real FORCES, once purified and unified the Physical Forces.
THE PRIER. Physics Institutes, scientists keen on the Research,
please, let you collaborate an disclose this important new, if you
really love the Physics an the men life, in a moment so in need of
"pure" energy!
Now we really do this real PRAYER to anyone seriously looks for the
advancement of the knowledge:
"If you desire to receive all the documents of our work, please, let
you contact us, writing in e-mail to ra.amodeo@libero.it, or
telephoning, or writing by post. Your contacts will be always wished
and always welcome!".
I deliberately do not write other, to not scare - once more - the real
reading... through our immense work made in tenths of years of
secluded studies.
Thank you!
Romano Amodeo
New Italic School of Epistemology
Via Larga 12, 21047 Saronno (VA) - ITALY
tel.: 339 2475658 - e-mail: ra.amodeo@libero.it |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Dono
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:52 am Post subject: Re: The "purification" in the E=mc^2 will bring to c^2=9, an |
|
|
On Jul 9, 5:02 am, amoram <ra.amo...@libero.it> wrote:
<snip>
Another day, another nutter joins the forum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
The TimeLord
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:26 am Post subject: Gobbletygook; was Re: The "purification" in the E=mc^2... |
|
|
Am Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:02:52 -0700 schrieb amoram <ra.amodeo@libero.it> in
7a5b59c4-8de6-470c-b58e-0e9ab9e82abb@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
| Quote: |
Dear attentive scientist, keen on the Physics Research,
[...]
The Purified Physics will soon allow the perfect calculus of the 2
necessary Forces (of magnetism and pressure) to realize the Atomic
Fusion.
|
However, magnetism is just one part of one force: electromagnetism. So
there's nothing new there. Pressure is just a manifestation of particle
interaction which result from electromagnetism, so there's nothing new
there either. At any rate, your assertion doesn't account for gravity,
nuclear decay (weak force) or nuclear interaction (strong force). So your
"purified physics" doesn't offer anything useful.
[...]
| Quote: |
While Einstein needed an "absolute" speed as c in E = mc^2..., and while
|
The "c" in that equation wasn't needed by Einstein. The whole equation
just popped out of an integration under the special condition that v=0.
So when v=0, then E=mc^2, regardless of what c turned out to be.
| Quote: |
by "pure" Principle the "absolute" in Physics is what is "not dependent
on - or relative to - anything else"..., the "light speed" hasn't this
"absolute" condition... if Physics respects this "pure" Principe about
"its absolute". In fact it is dependent on - and relative to - the real
electromagnetic front, that speed being certainly of a flow of a
volume... but this front, or section, is lacking!
|
This part is incomprehensible. Try to shorten your sentences and
eliminate side-issues.
| Quote: |
If Physics respects the "purity" in E=mc^2, how could m (a mass that has
its volume) be accelerated... not how a speed of "volume"? The "pure"
|
If a mass is accelerated, then v is not zero anymore and E=mc^2 won't
apply.
| Quote: |
light speed isn't speed of volume lacking its electromagnetic front! In
|
So what? (...even if it were true.)
| Quote: |
our N.I.S. calculations, its 299 792 458 m s^-1 results to be, at 10^-8
|
NIS? What's that? c=299'792'458 m/s by definition. See
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?c
[...]
Even though that part is written better, it is still incomprehensible. I
have no idea what your beef is with "purity". - Oh well...
[...]
| Quote: |
It is a question of "purity" that the "unit" represents everything. So,
|
It seems to me that you want to be too metaphysical with physics. For me
physics is a lot simpler than that. Nature does what nature wants and
it's up to us to figure out the right answer.
[...]
| Quote: |
SO THIS IS OUR THESIS.
|
Not very well stated. Oh well...
[...]
| Quote: |
AN THIS IS OUR SYNTHESIS
PURIFICATION OF THE c^2. The "absolute" speed of the electromagnetism
was indirectly fixed in 3×10^8 m/s BY DEFINITION, when 1 m was defined
|
Actually not. It is c=299'792'458 m/s by definition. See
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?c
| Quote: |
as the 10^-7 of 1/4 of the Earth Meridian, and as the cycle of 10
|
It was never officially defined that way. Originally 1 m was defined by a
standard meter stick in Paris, France. Now it is the distance in a vacuum
travelled by light in 1/299'792'458 of a second. See
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/current.html
[...]
| Quote: |
When there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, the c^2 measured with
this m is necessarily the absolute 9 m^2 s^-2 that must be ×10^16
times... because the m dimension's definition!
|
Careful, m is a scalar, so the word or even the concept of "dimension"
does not apply to m. Since you are so obsessed with "purity", you can
appreciate that. (...even if what you say were true.)
| Quote: |
PURIFICATION OF THE ATOMIC MASS. Again according to the initial
definitions, when m 1/10 is the length of the side of the unitary mass
of 1 dm^3 of water, and its unitary cycle is that of the 10 dm of 1 m,
|
The standard mass is made of platinum, not water. Not that this matters
much, but you seem to make unnecessary reference to "purity".
[...]
| Quote: |
Therefore, when there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, 9 is the
most unitary free energy, or the most free mass. Since 9,109389754
×10^-31 kg is the unitary mass of the free electron, and 9,109389754 is
more than 9, it isn't the PURE FORCE of the mass, but probably it is the
Moment of its Force. How 60° measured to the Sun aren't the Sun's
|
Aw c'mon, give me a break!!! Now you're just being stupidly anal-
retentive!
[...]
| Quote: |
THIS WILL SOON OPEN TO ATOMIC FUSION. Cut away in all the atomic masses
|
Good luck [giggles]!
[...]
--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
amoram
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:25 pm Post subject: Re: Gobbletygook; was Re: The "purification" in the E=mc^2.. |
|
|
On 10 Lug, 02:26, The TimeLord <math-n-physics-...@att.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Am Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:02:52 -0700 schrieb amoram <ra.amo...@libero.it> in
7a5b59c4-8de6-470c-b58e-0e9ab9e82...@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
Dear attentive scientist, keen on the Physics Research,
[...]
The Purified Physics will soon allow the perfect calculus of the 2
necessary Forces (of magnetism and pressure) to realize the Atomic
Fusion.
However, magnetism is just one part of one force: electromagnetism. So
there's nothing new there. Pressure is just a manifestation of particle
interaction which result from electromagnetism, so there's nothing new
there either. At any rate, your assertion doesn't account for gravity,
nuclear decay (weak force) or nuclear interaction (strong force). So your
"purified physics" doesn't offer anything useful.
Untill this moment, I agree. In fact the way to have it is told |
afterwards: with a percect calculus of the true force.
| Quote: |
While Einstein needed an "absolute" speed as c in E = mc^2..., and while
The "c" in that equation wasn't needed by Einstein. The whole equation
just popped out of an integration under the special condition that v=0.
So when v=0, then E=mc^2, regardless of what c turned out to be.
|
It is not important this, but the fact that c had to be an "absolute"
speed... and a speed that is ABSOLUTE doesn't imploys time... it get
the instantaneous levtromagnetical PRESENCE of all the Universe
| Quote: |
by "pure" Principle the "absolute" in Physics is what is "not dependent
on - or relative to - anything else"..., the "light speed" hasn't this
"absolute" condition... if Physics respects this "pure" Principe about
"its absolute". In fact it is dependent on - and relative to - the real
electromagnetic front, that speed being certainly of a flow of a
volume... but this front, or section, is lacking!
This part is incomprehensible. Try to shorten your sentences and
eliminate side-issues.
|
OK. by "pure" Principle the "absolute" in Physics is what is "not
dependent on - or relative to - anything else"..."
This affirmation isn't mine, any vocabulary of science gives thi
definition to the ABSOLUTE condition. I have token it just in one
vocabulary of Phisic.
Now if I. that is the PHYSICS affirm that:
1) the ABSOLUTE is not relative on - or relative to - anything else"
2) the ABSOLUTE light speed is the result of an experiment, that
measures it in the vacuum...
In these 2 points there is a great CONTRADICTION.
The ABSOLUTE can be RELATIVE to a measurement!
After I write: "In fact it is dependent on - and relative to - the
real electromagnetic front"
and even this is TRUE. A light speed is always the speed of the
electromagnetic front. Any flow is the volume formed by the
transversal area (its width) and by the line of the flow. Only the
speed of the flow is a pure parameter referred a nothing, while the
reality is not this. In fact the speed of light is the speed of the
electromagnetic front of the wave.
Afterward I write: "that speed being certainly of a flow of a
volume... but this front, or section, is lacking!"
How I have told the light is not a "pure parameter", but the
electromahnetic volume havin the front electromagnetic and the flow
electric... at is reallu a volume of flow. The simple speed is an
indetermination, if it is note refered to the volume.
| Quote: |
volume... but this front, or section, is lacking!
|
Do you know the existence in E=mc^2 of the volume, in c^2?
So a mass (that has a volume) should advance as a "pure velocity that
is not expressed how a speed of volume?
Can I, a man, run as a jet? No, I can be in run only with a speed of a
man... also if c is faster!
Also if it is faster, but not my speed, I cannot assume that speed if
I am rigorous, and if I say that a man can run only AS A MAN.
In the same way the mass m, in c^2, can have only the speed of a
volume, being the mass tha FORCE of the WEIGHT of the matter of the
volume. 10^3 are all the unitary massed of ONE METRE CUBE of water (in
the first definition of the unitary weight of the mass.
| Quote: |
If Physics respects the "purity" in E=mc^2, how could m (a mass that has
its volume) be accelerated... not how a speed of "volume"? The "pure"
|
You ask the mean of "pure". OK. I give to this word the meaning of
what is respectful of the assumed Principle
| Quote: |
If a mass is accelerated, then v is not zero anymore and E=mc^2 won't
apply.
|
The product "m multiplied by c^2" is a mass having speed c, that is
accelerated till to c^2... but the acceleration must be possible.
If you don't understand that it is not possible multiply an APPLE by a
PEAR for those necessities of congruencies that I have told before,
you cannot undestand what I means talking of a mass that can be
accelerated only how a VOLUME of mass, beacue it is a volume.
| Quote: |
light speed isn't speed of volume lacking its electromagnetic front! In
So what? (...even if it were true.)
|
Wat? It is not a speed OF VOLUME, and so it is not congruous with the
possibility of the mass to be put in relation to ANOTHER THING... how
the speed of a jet! Why not the speed of a jet?
Only the mass of a Jet can be accelerated how a Jet, bein relative to
the volume of the jet and not... to the mine.
| Quote: |
our N.I.S. calculations, its 299 792 458 m s^-1 results to be, at 10^-8
NIS? What's that?
|
It is the New Italic School of Epistemology, that studies this matter
by 30 years, and has reached its results.
c=299'792'458 m/s by definition. Seehttp://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?c
| Quote: |
299792458 m s^-1 is the speed of an electromagnetic front that in its |
reality is that of the Candela (540 times 10^12 cycles/s).
[...]
| Quote: |
Even though that part is written better, it is still incomprehensible. I
have no idea what your beef is with "purity". - Oh well...
Purity is what is always contradiction. If I measure the weight of a |
mass, and it is always the same, but show to me the MOMENT of the
Force of the mass, and not the "purity" of the mass, here is this lack
of "purity", because a thing is a FORCE, anoter is the MOMENT of a
force [...]
| Quote: |
It is a question of "purity" that the "unit" represents everything. So,
|
Always the PURITY, explains the UNIT how the WHOLE, because it is 1/10
of the ABSOLUTE CYCLE 10 of all the SI, when was adopted the Decimal
Metric Sistem.
| Quote: |
It seems to me that you want to be too metaphysical with physics. For me
physics is a lot simpler than that. Nature does what nature wants and
it's up to us to figure out the right answer.
|
The NATURE is a reality OBSERVED from US OBSERVERS (of the Physics)
and all its QUANTITY and ITS QUALITY, is only the fruit of our BRAIN,
that conceive colour, sounds, the mass how the perception of the tact,
etc.
Time and space are only CATEGORIES of the human perception and
idealization: space is what is more than 1 m, time is what is littler.
1/10 is the "time" of the mass, because it is referred to the 10 cycle
of the mass.
Whithout the IDEAL contribute of our imagination, the world is only a
binary contest 0001001101010 how a DVD.
Don't be ingenuous and think that "because we are seeng movements of
masses, it really exist". Also in a DVD we se it and in it nothing is
in momement if doesn't enter in joke a "codex" of interpretation. In
the world we put in action this codex.
| Quote: |
[...]
SO THIS IS OUR THESIS.
Not very well stated. Oh well...
Excuse me but I don't understand what you try to tell to me with "not |
very well stated".
Have someting to contradict that, since 10^3 where al the unitary
masses of the volume, the 1/4 (of the presence of the time t, in the 4
xyzt) of the Meridian was STATED (I say DEFINED, od DECISED, or FIXED)
10^7 long because 10^10 : 10^3 = 10^7?
The 10^7 lenght is a lenght ove m^3 FULL OF MASS, so it represent the
IDEAL line containg the mass.
Now if the PRESENCE of 1/4 of meridian is m 10^7 (so perfectly realted
to the ABSOLUTE MODEL 10^10), and if the cycle of the mass is x10,
10^8 is the cycle in m/s, or m s^-1.
3 time 10^8 is a FIXATION of the cycle absolute of the Terrestran fee
mass. More crear than so!
[...]
| Quote: |
AN THIS IS OUR SYNTHESIS
PURIFICATION OF THE c^2. The "absolute" speed of the electromagnetism
was indirectly fixed in 3×10^8 m/s BY DEFINITION, when 1 m was defined
|
Dear friend, when I CONTROL THE PRINCIPLES, I'm looking to control if
afterwards the same PRINCIPLES are respected!
real measuere of lenght to count how many Champions were runned by the
light in a second.
On this base are 299792458... by definition, since the constance of
this reality, while the champion in platinum-hiridion was not constant
with the variation of the temperature.
But the METRES of 299792458 are the lenght od the inistial champion. I
metre isn't a reality in itself, that can be measured in itself.
| Quote: |
as the 10^-7 of 1/4 of the Earth Meridian, and as the cycle of 10
It was never officially defined that way. Originally 1 m was defined by a
standard meter stick in Paris, France. Now it is the distance in a vacuum
travelled by light in 1/299'792'458 of a second. Seehttp://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/current.html
|
There happened the most possible precise measurement of the Meridian
Terrestrial, to realize the champion in paltinum-hiridion!
| Quote: |
[...]
When there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, the c^2 measured with
this m is necessarily the absolute 9 m^2 s^-2 that must be ×10^16
times... because the m dimension's definition!
|
Oh, I care to consider THE FIRST DEFINITION, that is the ONLY that has
put in relation of m kg and s, on the base of a body free in the space-
time. When PHYSUCS, for the precision, keep away the relation of m kg
e s to the Earth body, the Physics looses the shape of the triplex
relation, and it is not easy to consider it existence
| Quote: |
Careful, m is a scalar, so the word or even the concept of "dimension"
does not apply to m. Since you are so obsessed with "purity", you can
appreciate that. (...even if what you say were true.)
|
Thanks! The DIMENSION is an exponent how the 3 of 10^3. I, in my
"purity", had to write pheraps "lenght" (o length? without the
automatic correction I am in difficulty with the English of me
Italian, that have studied only 40 years ago! But I am "poor" and so
also the New Italic School, and we cannot to pay who was able to
correct) In this moment I am in a place in which I can use Internet
gratis, and I haven't taken the vocabulary.
| Quote: |
PURIFICATION OF THE ATOMIC MASS. Again according to the initial
definitions, when m 1/10 is the length of the side of the unitary mass
of 1 dm^3 of water, and its unitary cycle is that of the 10 dm of 1 m,
The standard mass is made of platinum, not water. Not that this matters
much, but you seem to make unnecessary reference to "purity".
|
Oh now I say not: "Tanks!" because I CONTROL USING THE PRINCIPLES! And
this weight of which you are saying was the weight of 1 dm^3 of water.
Only 10^3 for 10^7 of lenght are 10^10 ABSOLUTE MASSES.
Let you prove with the champion in platinum-iridion to have a
comparation with the 10^7 metres of 1/4 of Meridian... if you can!
So, if we don't considere THE DEFINITION OF THE BEGINNING... we are
LOST! We don't understand noting in the existing relativity among the
metre, the lhilogram and the second.
The second was 1/86400 of the day... and today is referred it also to
a wave, loosing it also the RELATION. But ONE DAY has always 86400
seconds! However we define yhe second.
Only that 864 is (3+3)x(3+3)x10 (the cycle), and was multiplied by the
10 cycle of the 24 present in 2^10=1024, that shows the 24 "hours" of
an ideal free mass 10^3, containing all the unitary masses... like the
free bodi of the Earth.
So the absolute speed 3, that is present in (3+3)x(3+3)x10 (3+3)x(3+3)x(3/3 x 3x3) = 360, multiplied by 240 got the 86400 second
of a day in second today FIXED in another way, loosing the realtion to
the free mass well represented in line.
| Quote: |
[...]
Therefore, when there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, 9 is the
most unitary free energy, or the most free mass. Since 9,109389754
×10^-31 kg is the unitary mass of the free electron, and 9,109389754 is
more than 9, it isn't the PURE FORCE of the mass, but probably it is the
Moment of its Force. How 60° measured to the Sun aren't the Sun's
Aw c'mon, give me a break!!! Now you're just being stupidly anal-
retentive!
|
A break? I have to find the WHY in more of 100 years nobody could do
the unification and pretend to undertand in a moment!
If this question should not ELUSIVE, the Unification should be already
made!
Do you not understand that if 1 dm^3 of water (do you see tha vantage
to use the PRINCIPLES of the definitions?) exist in the dinamic
unitari cycle of 10 dm its possible movements is ONLY 9?
A mass that falls of 1 m, has the energy of its fall. 1 joule is 1
metre of movement of the unit of the force.
So, when we don't use the Force appliated to the centre of application
who (being 1 point has 0 lenght) we have 1 m of movement, that is onlu
9 dm when the mass is 1 dm in lenght.
9 is the MAXIMUM, o a free mass or of a free energy.
But be patient! When you reed what I write you have to compel yourself
to pay attention at what I say, and not pretend that I use your
language... if it is not properly the mine, being I an architect in my
scolastic preparation.
The fact that I have made the sforce to hunderstand what in the time
never has been understood and you pretend to be a GOD of intelligence,
that or immediately understand... or it is wrong what is written!
Remember: if in more than 100 years nobody has made the Unification,
there is a reason that is ELUSIVE.
This is elusive: to measure the weight of one electron and to have not
considered the presence of the atomic distance, how a factor of
variation of the electromagnetism that makes tha matter's mass.
But the wieght was always the same, and so it was confused for FORCE
OF MASS, being - on the contrary - the MOMENT of the FORCE of the
weight of the mass.
How discover this elusive matter? Through the 9 numer invariant of the
Decimal Sistem of all the units of the SI.
If in this general context the 10 is the ABSOLUTE REFERENCE, its
absolute invariance is the 9!
It is a question of ... PURITY. Now you well know the meaning that I
confer to it.
The PURITY of a General System that uses the Decimal Metric Sistem
FIXES that the ratio E/m of the General Relativity is the 9 numer
invariant of the MAXIMUM SYSTEM IN USE.
The most difficult thin is the semplicity.
Eistein - a genius! - arrived to the INVARIANCE OF THE 9, in a way so
complicate... but it wasn't necessary
In E = m c^2 we have in a member E, the pure ability to work (wen
there is the time to do a work), in the oter member we have the
unitary relation of the 2 opposite forms OF WORK MADE: the full
amassing of the mass and the full expansion of the wave.
The product of the opposit is the unit and when they interact is is
how the partice was put in realation with ist antiparticle. This
interaction destroies the 2 opposite actions (particlke and
antiparticle) in the pure Energy equivalent.
So we have E = +m -m (the product matter for antimatter)
We see that the C^ must be the same of the ANTIMATTER (in fact is
expansion, the contrary of the compression).
Now in the relation m c^2 is the space what is the general context of
bot. 1 m is 10 -9 =1, while 1 +9 =10.
It is aritmetic elementar.
We see that IN SPACE tha mass 1 is -9 (of space in reduction), while
the c^2, in space, is +9 in spece in expansion.
The opposition -9 +9 is the product m c^2.
It is 1 because -9 is the Log of 10^-9 (the absolute worth of 9 in
base 10), while +9 is the Log of 10^9. So the product 10^-9 x 10^9 is
10^(-9 +9) = 10^0 = 1. 1 of what? Of the abylity to work when is
introduced tte time of a real fall.
| Quote: |
[...]
THIS WILL SOON OPEN TO ATOMIC FUSION. Cut away in all the atomic masses
Good luck [giggles]!
|
Jes, "good luck, humanity!"
I'm not able to do the calculus, but certainly exists who is able,
once that the quantity of the FORCES are the exact forces, entirely
known, and not the Moments of the forces, always approximated
I hope that many Fisicists can took this our idea, and to do the
proof. In this world MILLIONS are invested in the difficult tentative
to simulate the Sun, in the plasma, not having the possible
Compression to compel the plasma to not expand itself.
In the H bomb it was made, but this DIMENSION cannot be controlled!
On the contrary I think that there is the real possibility to have
MOTORS at compression and that - with a magnetism sintillate - are
able to product all the pure energy that the humanity needs.
How the motors that, with an electric scintillate and the pressure,
expand the gass. Also the compression of 2 Idrogen atoms in 1 of Elio
can have this expansions, but it'll be easyer in its use the termic
energy to have afterwards the electric.
Excuse my poor language!
| Quote: |
[...]
--
// The TimeLord says:
// Pogo 2.0 = We have met the aliens, and they are us! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
ideas
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2008 7:29 pm Post subject: Re: The "purification" in the E=mc^2 will bring to c^2=9, an |
|
|
On 9 Lug, 14:02, amoram <ra.amo...@libero.it> wrote:
| Quote: |
Dear attentive scientist, keen on the Physics Research,
any who
searches gold, is glad when finds a pure sign of gold in a immense
river... The gold that the New Italic School of Epistemology,
searching and purifying the physical matter, has found, is even the
PHYSICS UNIFICATION.
Now I really hope that you don't throw away - suddenly - all this
river of our researches, only for distrust or... as soon as you'll
believe that its sand is not "all made of gold"... if you really
search a new start for yourselves!
The Purified Physics will soon allow the perfect calculus of the 2
necessary Forces (of magnetism and pressure) to realize the Atomic
Fusion.
Please, let you read! If you don't believe that our result was
possible, let you search in it at least a new starting for your
research!
The N.I.S. needs it at most, because nobody knows its work, and asks
modestly the help for reaching together this goal
A new start for your researches can happen, already, simply "noting
the lack of purity" existing today in the application of the
Einstein's General Relativity.
While Einstein needed an "absolute" speed as c in E = mc^2..., and
while by "pure" Principle the "absolute" in Physics is what is "not
dependent on - or relative to - anything else"..., the "light speed"
hasn't this "absolute" condition... if Physics respects this "pure"
Principe about "its absolute". In fact it is dependent on - and
relative to - the real electromagnetic front, that speed being
certainly of a flow of a volume... but this front, or section, is
lacking!
If Physics respects the "purity" in E=mc^2, how could m (a mass that
has its volume) be accelerated... not how a speed of "volume"? The
"pure" light speed isn't speed of volume lacking its electromagnetic
front! In our N.I.S. calculations, its 299 792 458 m s^-1 results to
be, at 10^-8 m^2 unitary dimension, the movement of the front big
1.0006922855944561487267301434248, for 1 m^3 s^-1 of flow, flow of the
"pure" its existence... and the speed in line is clearly of 3/1 m
s^-1, when it is "flow of volume", and not only the "undefined" speed
299 792 458 m s^-1, even if it is always invariant!
In Mathematics an "absolute" quantity hasn't the algebraic sign of a
Vector of real speed, so also in Mathematics the 299 792 458 m/s in a
direction, of the light speed, isn't an "absolute" mathematical
quantity, if Physics respects the mathematical "purity" in the D.M.S.
(decimal metric system) of the SI units. If the "purity" imposes the
volume's flow, 3 m^3 s^-1 is a "pure" math quantity of existence,
divided in 1 s of duration, and it is not a vector!
The SI units have the 10 cycle as the common unit of its decimal
units, so its "only invariant number" is 9, if the Physics respects
the "purity" of the D.M.S. of the SI. Its "purity" shows the 1 mass
falling of 9, or the 9 energy falling of 1. 1 and 9 are reciprocal
numbers, in the cycle 10. 1+9=10, or 10-9=1. The first expands 1 to 10
through +9 spaces, the second amasses 10 in 1 through -9 spaces. +9 an
-9 are all the "imposed" movement's energies, "imposed as fundament"
by the D.M.S. of the SI units.
The lack of UNIFICATION - finally - seems the lack of "purity"
consisting just in the "violation" of this 9 invariant number of the
D.M.S., when are adopted, at its "due" place, 2 different numbers of
units... in the same electromagnetism: A) 8.98755... in 10^16 m^2 s^-2
for the expanded c^2 mass B) 9,10938754 in 10^-31 kg for the amassed
electron's mass..., where the "purity" imposes that a "number of mass"
is not dependent on its form: diffused or amassed. Afterwards, adopted
involuntarily 2 different "numbers", - strangely - it is more than 100
years that the Physics asks in vain "why" there is not unity! And it
tries an "impossible" real connection between the forces! It is
impossible to reach, when we have introduced 2 "inverse mistakes",
introducing not "pure Forces", but 2 different "space/time Moments":
one negative in the full light expansion (what lacks to 3, in
2.99792...), and one positive in the full amassing of the light (what
is more than 9, in the 9.198389754 of the electron).
It is a question of "purity" that the "unit" represents everything.
So, being 1 m^3 the unit of the volume, amassed in 3 directions, it is
3 m^3 simultaneously amassed in 1, that are passing in the existence's
time as 3 m^3 s^-1, having the speed in line of 3 m s^-1, that becomes
exactly the "absolute" 3×10^8 m s^-1 when the section is of 10^-8 m^2
(that unitary of the candela, the unitary intensity of the light of
the SI). So only the "ideal purity" approaches the "know-how", and we
understand because, in s^-1, we don't perceive 300 000 000 m, but 299
792 458 m.
We have a front wider than the Å^2 10^12 = m^2 10^-8 of the candela;
the real front is 1.000692285594...×10^-8 m^2. There is certainly a
space/time Moment (equal to the precise part exceeding 1 candela),
that gets in "properly" the "moment's worth", that is the "real
duration" of our perceived "moment of space-time". The lacking 207.542
m (in 300 000 000 m), are certainly put as "the time", in an only
"virtual and imaginary" section (of our mind), to place after the
presence and to really scatter (all what exists only simultaneously)
in the light's time perception of the time-present mass. We have the
PROOFS, of this system to act of our intelligence, to live a life
having same duration and not... all together. It's necessary the
scattered time in every "music".
SO THIS IS OUR THESIS.
In E = mc^2 the lack of Unification depends on the "lack of purity" :
1) about the "Absolute" speed of the electromagnetic volume; 2) about
the Atomic Forces of its masses. The first isn't "pure" in a
"measured" speed, but it is the linear definition of the mass
"present" in a volume, indirectly already assumed with 1 m and 1 kg
related to the Earth mass. The second is the "Force of the mass" and
not the "Moment of its Force", that today is exchanged for a "pure"
Force.
AN THIS IS OUR SYNTHESIS
PURIFICATION OF THE c^2. The "absolute" speed of the electromagnetism
was indirectly fixed in 3×10^8 m/s BY DEFINITION, when 1 m was defined
as the 10^-7 of 1/4 of the Earth Meridian, and as the cycle of 10
decimal unitary masses put in sequence. In that precise moment the
space of 3/4 of the Meridian's length was 3×10^7 m long, and the 10
cycle of this present mass was necessarily of 3×10^8 m/s. Since the
unit in the SI is the 10 cycle, this absolute speed isn't 3/1 m/s (but
10^8 times bigger) only by the m imposed as 10^-8 of the cycle of the
unitary mass. When there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, the
c^2 measured with this m is necessarily the absolute 9 m^2 s^-2 that
must be ×10^16 times... because the m dimension's definition!
PURIFICATION OF THE ATOMIC MASS. Again according to the initial
definitions, when m 1/10 is the length of the side of the unitary mass
of 1 dm^3 of water, and its unitary cycle is that of the 10 dm of 1 m,
the most fall of 1 dm^3 of water (occupying 1 dm in height in the 10
dm of its dynamic cycle in height) is certainly of 9 dm, and certainly
the energy is 9 (as how 9 kg fallen of 1, as how 1 kg fallen of 9). It
is correct, having the same number 9 of the energy of the absolute
expansion 9, were there is equivalence between energy and mass.
Therefore, when there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, 9 is the
most unitary free energy, or the most free mass. Since 9,109389754
×10^-31 kg is the unitary mass of the free electron, and 9,109389754
is more than 9, it isn't the PURE FORCE of the mass, but probably it
is the Moment of its Force. How 60° measured to the Sun aren't the
Sun's Temperature (since the incidence of the space)... so 9,109389754
×10^-31 kg isn't the electron mass (since the incidence of the atomic
space). The space/time acts as in the macro, as in the micro of the
dimension. If the result of a balancing shows always this "moment", it
is always a "moment" and never becomes a "pure" Force.
Purifying the Forces of the masses, we have seen how all the physical
constants, at the same dimensions, assume the worthies of pure ratios,
in their number.
(Only for example: c is 3/1=3; c^2 is 3×3=9; Planck constant is 400/
(3+3)=66.6666...; Plank mass is 3×7=21; Planck time is (3×3)×(3+3)=54;
a.m.u. is 100/(3+3)=16.666...; electron mass in kg is 3×3=9; electron
mass in a.m.u. is 0.009/(16.6666...)=0.00054, or 540 (the candela's
number)/10^6=0.00054; electron mass in MeV is 54 -2(of MeV front)=52;
electron corpuscle in a.m.u. is 0,00054/3=0,00018; electron radius is
54/18=3; electron Volt and electric charge are 2^4=16; Avogadro's
number is 6=the Log of (10^10):(10^4); fine structure is the Log of
(10^100)×[10^-(3^3)]=73; Boltzman constant is (10^4)/
(73-1)=138.8888...; molar constant of gasses is 100/12=8,3333...;
Rydberg constant is 10/(0,90 periodic)=11, molar volume of an ideal
gas is 10/(0.45 periodic)=22, Faraday constant is (2^4)^6=96, etc.).
THIS WILL SOON OPEN TO ATOMIC FUSION. Cut away in all the atomic
masses what today is only the "Moment of the Force", and obtained the
PURITY of the FORCES, finally the Physics is unified an can do the
perfect calculus of the Forces to UNIFY also two hydrogen's atoms.
Finally it'll be possible until the real calculus of the true Force
(of magnetism and pressure) to compel - by magnetism - the lining up
of all the rotation's axes of the electron orbital planes, and - by
pressure - the penetration of two orbital planes made relatively
motionless because rotating at the same angular speed. Finally we'll
have the atomic fusion possibility obtained by the PURE calculus of
the real FORCES, once purified and unified the Physical Forces.
THE PRIER. Physics Institutes, scientists keen on the Research,
please, let you collaborate an disclose this important new, if you
really love the Physics an the men life, in a moment so in need of
"pure" energy!
leggi tutto...
|
Dear Romano Amodeo, thanks for your attempt, that I judge full of
passion, but also of intelligence.
Really, to resolve the problems how this it is necessary the just
attention.
I'll study what you say and if I can do someting I'll make.
I also love the research.
Good by! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
terenz8
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:12 pm Post subject: Re: The "purification" in the E=mc^2 will bring to c^2=9, an |
|
|
On 9 Lug, 14:02, amoram <ra.amo...@libero.it> wrote:
| Quote: |
Dear attentive scientist, keen on the Physics Research,
any who
searches gold, is glad when finds a pure sign of gold in a immense
river... The gold that the New Italic School of Epistemology,
searching and purifying the physical matter, has found, is even the
PHYSICS UNIFICATION.
Now I really hope that you don't throw away - suddenly - all this
river of our researches, only for distrust or... as soon as you'll
believe that its sand is not "all made of gold"... if you really
search a new start for yourselves!
The Purified Physics will soon allow the perfect calculus of the 2
necessary Forces (of magnetism and pressure) to realize the Atomic
Fusion.
Please, let you read! If you don't believe that our result was
possible, let you search in it at least a new starting for your
research!
The N.I.S. needs it at most, because nobody knows its work, and asks
modestly the help for reaching together this goal
A new start for your researches can happen, already, simply "noting
the lack of purity" existing today in the application of the
Einstein's General Relativity.
While Einstein needed an "absolute" speed as c in E = mc^2..., and
while by "pure" Principle the "absolute" in Physics is what is "not
dependent on - or relative to - anything else"..., the "light speed"
hasn't this "absolute" condition... if Physics respects this "pure"
Principe about "its absolute". In fact it is dependent on - and
relative to - the real electromagnetic front, that speed being
certainly of a flow of a volume... but this front, or section, is
lacking!
If Physics respects the "purity" in E=mc^2, how could m (a mass that
has its volume) be accelerated... not how a speed of "volume"? The
"pure" light speed isn't speed of volume lacking its electromagnetic
front! In our N.I.S. calculations, its 299 792 458 m s^-1 results to
be, at 10^-8 m^2 unitary dimension, the movement of the front big
1.0006922855944561487267301434248, for 1 m^3 s^-1 of flow, flow of the
"pure" its existence... and the speed in line is clearly of 3/1 m
s^-1, when it is "flow of volume", and not only the "undefined" speed
299 792 458 m s^-1, even if it is always invariant!
In Mathematics an "absolute" quantity hasn't the algebraic sign of a
Vector of real speed, so also in Mathematics the 299 792 458 m/s in a
direction, of the light speed, isn't an "absolute" mathematical
quantity, if Physics respects the mathematical "purity" in the D.M.S.
(decimal metric system) of the SI units. If the "purity" imposes the
volume's flow, 3 m^3 s^-1 is a "pure" math quantity of existence,
divided in 1 s of duration, and it is not a vector!
The SI units have the 10 cycle as the common unit of its decimal
units, so its "only invariant number" is 9, if the Physics respects
the "purity" of the D.M.S. of the SI. Its "purity" shows the 1 mass
falling of 9, or the 9 energy falling of 1. 1 and 9 are reciprocal
numbers, in the cycle 10. 1+9=10, or 10-9=1. The first expands 1 to 10
through +9 spaces, the second amasses 10 in 1 through -9 spaces. +9 an
-9 are all the "imposed" movement's energies, "imposed as fundament"
by the D.M.S. of the SI units.
The lack of UNIFICATION - finally - seems the lack of "purity"
consisting just in the "violation" of this 9 invariant number of the
D.M.S., when are adopted, at its "due" place, 2 different numbers of
units... in the same electromagnetism: A) 8.98755... in 10^16 m^2 s^-2
for the expanded c^2 mass B) 9,10938754 in 10^-31 kg for the amassed
electron's mass..., where the "purity" imposes that a "number of mass"
is not dependent on its form: diffused or amassed. Afterwards, adopted
involuntarily 2 different "numbers", - strangely - it is more than 100
years that the Physics asks in vain "why" there is not unity! And it
tries an "impossible" real connection between the forces! It is
impossible to reach, when we have introduced 2 "inverse mistakes",
introducing not "pure Forces", but 2 different "space/time Moments":
one negative in the full light expansion (what lacks to 3, in
2.99792...), and one positive in the full amassing of the light (what
is more than 9, in the 9.198389754 of the electron).
It is a question of "purity" that the "unit" represents everything.
So, being 1 m^3 the unit of the volume, amassed in 3 directions, it is
3 m^3 simultaneously amassed in 1, that are passing in the existence's
time as 3 m^3 s^-1, having the speed in line of 3 m s^-1, that becomes
exactly the "absolute" 3×10^8 m s^-1 when the section is of 10^-8 m^2
(that unitary of the candela, the unitary intensity of the light of
the SI). So only the "ideal purity" approaches the "know-how", and we
understand because, in s^-1, we don't perceive 300 000 000 m, but 299
792 458 m.
We have a front wider than the Å^2 10^12 = m^2 10^-8 of the candela;
the real front is 1.000692285594...×10^-8 m^2. There is certainly a
space/time Moment (equal to the precise part exceeding 1 candela),
that gets in "properly" the "moment's worth", that is the "real
duration" of our perceived "moment of space-time". The lacking 207.542
m (in 300 000 000 m), are certainly put as "the time", in an only
"virtual and imaginary" section (of our mind), to place after the
presence and to really scatter (all what exists only simultaneously)
in the light's time perception of the time-present mass. We have the
PROOFS, of this system to act of our intelligence, to live a life
having same duration and not... all together. It's necessary the
scattered time in every "music".
SO THIS IS OUR THESIS.
In E = mc^2 the lack of Unification depends on the "lack of purity" :
1) about the "Absolute" speed of the electromagnetic volume; 2) about
the Atomic Forces of its masses. The first isn't "pure" in a
"measured" speed, but it is the linear definition of the mass
"present" in a volume, indirectly already assumed with 1 m and 1 kg
related to the Earth mass. The second is the "Force of the mass" and
not the "Moment of its Force", that today is exchanged for a "pure"
Force.
AN THIS IS OUR SYNTHESIS
PURIFICATION OF THE c^2. The "absolute" speed of the electromagnetism
was indirectly fixed in 3×10^8 m/s BY DEFINITION, when 1 m was defined
as the 10^-7 of 1/4 of the Earth Meridian, and as the cycle of 10
decimal unitary masses put in sequence. In that precise moment the
space of 3/4 of the Meridian's length was 3×10^7 m long, and the 10
cycle of this present mass was necessarily of 3×10^8 m/s. Since the
unit in the SI is the 10 cycle, this absolute speed isn't 3/1 m/s (but
10^8 times bigger) only by the m imposed as 10^-8 of the cycle of the
unitary mass. When there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, the
c^2 measured with this m is necessarily the absolute 9 m^2 s^-2 that
must be ×10^16 times... because the m dimension's definition!
PURIFICATION OF THE ATOMIC MASS. Again according to the initial
definitions, when m 1/10 is the length of the side of the unitary mass
of 1 dm^3 of water, and its unitary cycle is that of the 10 dm of 1 m,
the most fall of 1 dm^3 of water (occupying 1 dm in height in the 10
dm of its dynamic cycle in height) is certainly of 9 dm, and certainly
the energy is 9 (as how 9 kg fallen of 1, as how 1 kg fallen of 9). It
is correct, having the same number 9 of the energy of the absolute
expansion 9, were there is equivalence between energy and mass.
Therefore, when there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, 9 is the
most unitary free energy, or the most free mass. Since 9,109389754
×10^-31 kg is the unitary mass of the free electron, and 9,109389754
is more than 9, it isn't the PURE FORCE of the mass, but probably it
is the Moment of its Force. How 60° measured to the Sun aren't the
Sun's Temperature (since the incidence of the space)... so 9,109389754
×10^-31 kg isn't the electron mass (since the incidence of the atomic
space). The space/time acts as in the macro, as in the micro of the
dimension. If the result of a balancing shows always this "moment", it
is always a "moment" and never becomes a "pure" Force.
Purifying the Forces of the masses, we have seen how all the physical
constants, at the same dimensions, assume the worthies of pure ratios,
in their number.
(Only for example: c is 3/1=3; c^2 is 3×3=9; Planck constant is 400/
(3+3)=66.6666...; Plank mass is 3×7=21; Planck time is (3×3)×(3+3)=54;
a.m.u. is 100/(3+3)=16.666...; electron mass in kg is 3×3=9; electron
mass in a.m.u. is 0.009/(16.6666...)=0.00054, or 540 (the candela's
number)/10^6=0.00054; electron mass in MeV is 54 -2(of MeV front)=52;
electron corpuscle in a.m.u. is 0,00054/3=0,00018; electron radius is
54/18=3; electron Volt and electric charge are 2^4=16; Avogadro's
number is 6=the Log of (10^10):(10^4); fine structure is the Log of
(10^100)×[10^-(3^3)]=73; Boltzman constant is (10^4)/
(73-1)=138.8888...; molar constant of gasses is 100/12=8,3333...;
Rydberg constant is 10/(0,90 periodic)=11, molar volume of an ideal
gas is 10/(0.45 periodic)=22, Faraday constant is (2^4)^6=96, etc.).
THIS WILL SOON OPEN TO ATOMIC FUSION. Cut away in all the atomic
masses what today is only the "Moment of the Force", and obtained the
PURITY of the FORCES, finally the Physics is unified an can do the
perfect calculus of the Forces to UNIFY also two hydrogen's atoms.
Finally it'll be possible until the real calculus of the true Force
(of magnetism and pressure) to compel - by magnetism - the lining up
of all the rotation's axes of the electron orbital planes, and - by
pressure - the penetration of two orbital planes made relatively
motionless because rotating at the same angular speed. Finally we'll
have the atomic fusion possibility obtained by the PURE calculus of
the real FORCES, once purified and unified the Physical Forces.
THE PRIER. Physics Institutes, scientists keen on the Research,
please, let you collaborate an disclose this important new, if you
really love the Physics an the men life, in a moment so in need of
"pure" energy!
leggi tutto...
|
The First Relativity, you are right, was fixed in the 1791, when ALL
THE UNITS of the Physics WERE ADOPTED HOW "TEN" units.
This relativity, between the cycle TEN and the number ONE of this
cycle, IS THE FIRST RELATION that exists in all the International
System of the weight and measurements.
You are right! In that same moment the GENERAL RELATIVITY in the
actions adopted, also if not in the precise affirmation how the
GENERAL RELATIVITY of Einstein, was:
FULL ENERGY OF ONE MASS (so the ratio E/m internal to the TEN cycle of
ONEe mass) IS 9 OF 1 (so the ratio 9/1).
The GENERAL RELATIVITY of Einstein CANNOT CONTRADICT THIS!
If the Physicists will pay attention to your Epistemologic check, also
the mass will be purified.
In fact the MASS is an electromagnetic quantity, how the TEMPERATURE.
If the atomic distance of one particle of light cannot be removed, its
MASS will appear always the same, but always there the incidence of
the distance relatively to its distance.
The fact difficult to understand, I think, it that a mass, expanded on
not is always the same, how if the space shall have no importance.
It hasn't because we are able, in our space, to perceive the exixting
difference from a Force as the mass and the Moment of its force.
It is difficult to be perceived in the atomic dimension in which we
really cannot enter! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
terenz8
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 7:25 pm Post subject: Re: The REAL NECESSITY TO PAY THE MOST ATTENTION TO THE Roma |
|
|
On 16 Lug, 21:12, terenz8 <terz...@libero.it> wrote:
| Quote: |
On 9 Lug, 14:02, amoram <ra.amo...@libero.it> wrote:
Dear attentive scientist, keen on the Physics Research,
any who
searches gold, is glad when finds a pure sign of gold in a immense
river... The gold that the New Italic School of Epistemology,
searching and purifying the physical matter, has found, is even the
PHYSICS UNIFICATION.
Now I really hope that you don't throw away - suddenly - all this
river of our researches, only for distrust or... as soon as you'll
believe that its sand is not "all made of gold"... if you really
search a new start for yourselves!
The Purified Physics will soon allow the perfect calculus of the 2
necessary Forces (of magnetism and pressure) to realize the Atomic
Fusion.
Please, let you read! If you don't believe that our result was
possible, let you search in it at least a new starting for your
research!
The N.I.S. needs it at most, because nobody knows its work, and asks
modestly the help for reaching together this goal
A new start for your researches can happen, already, simply "noting
the lack of purity" existing today in the application of the
Einstein's General Relativity.
While Einstein needed an "absolute" speed as c in E = mc^2..., and
while by "pure" Principle the "absolute" in Physics is what is "not
dependent on - or relative to - anything else"..., the "light speed"
hasn't this "absolute" condition... if Physics respects this "pure"
Principe about "its absolute". In fact it is dependent on - and
relative to - the real electromagnetic front, that speed being
certainly of a flow of a volume... but this front, or section, is
lacking!
If Physics respects the "purity" in E=mc^2, how could m (a mass that
has its volume) be accelerated... not how a speed of "volume"? The
"pure" light speed isn't speed of volume lacking its electromagnetic
front! In our N.I.S. calculations, its 299 792 458 m s^-1 results to
be, at 10^-8 m^2 unitary dimension, the movement of the front big
1.0006922855944561487267301434248, for 1 m^3 s^-1 of flow, flow of the
"pure" its existence... and the speed in line is clearly of 3/1 m
s^-1, when it is "flow of volume", and not only the "undefined" speed
299 792 458 m s^-1, even if it is always invariant!
In Mathematics an "absolute" quantity hasn't the algebraic sign of a
Vector of real speed, so also in Mathematics the 299 792 458 m/s in a
direction, of the light speed, isn't an "absolute" mathematical
quantity, if Physics respects the mathematical "purity" in the D.M.S.
(decimal metric system) of the SI units. If the "purity" imposes the
volume's flow, 3 m^3 s^-1 is a "pure" math quantity of existence,
divided in 1 s of duration, and it is not a vector!
The SI units have the 10 cycle as the common unit of its decimal
units, so its "only invariant number" is 9, if the Physics respects
the "purity" of the D.M.S. of the SI. Its "purity" shows the 1 mass
falling of 9, or the 9 energy falling of 1. 1 and 9 are reciprocal
numbers, in the cycle 10. 1+9=10, or 10-9=1. The first expands 1 to 10
through +9 spaces, the second amasses 10 in 1 through -9 spaces. +9 an
-9 are all the "imposed" movement's energies, "imposed as fundament"
by the D.M.S. of the SI units.
The lack of UNIFICATION - finally - seems the lack of "purity"
consisting just in the "violation" of this 9 invariant number of the
D.M.S., when are adopted, at its "due" place, 2 different numbers of
units... in the same electromagnetism: A) 8.98755... in 10^16 m^2 s^-2
for the expanded c^2 mass B) 9,10938754 in 10^-31 kg for the amassed
electron's mass..., where the "purity" imposes that a "number of mass"
is not dependent on its form: diffused or amassed. Afterwards, adopted
involuntarily 2 different "numbers", - strangely - it is more than 100
years that the Physics asks in vain "why" there is not unity! And it
tries an "impossible" real connection between the forces! It is
impossible to reach, when we have introduced 2 "inverse mistakes",
introducing not "pure Forces", but 2 different "space/time Moments":
one negative in the full light expansion (what lacks to 3, in
2.99792...), and one positive in the full amassing of the light (what
is more than 9, in the 9.198389754 of the electron).
It is a question of "purity" that the "unit" represents everything.
So, being 1 m^3 the unit of the volume, amassed in 3 directions, it is
3 m^3 simultaneously amassed in 1, that are passing in the existence's
time as 3 m^3 s^-1, having the speed in line of 3 m s^-1, that becomes
exactly the "absolute" 3×10^8 m s^-1 when the section is of 10^-8 m^2
(that unitary of the candela, the unitary intensity of the light of
the SI). So only the "ideal purity" approaches the "know-how", and we
understand because, in s^-1, we don't perceive 300 000 000 m, but 299
792 458 m.
We have a front wider than the Å^2 10^12 = m^2 10^-8 of the candela;
the real front is 1.000692285594...×10^-8 m^2. There is certainly a
space/time Moment (equal to the precise part exceeding 1 candela),
that gets in "properly" the "moment's worth", that is the "real
duration" of our perceived "moment of space-time". The lacking 207.542
m (in 300 000 000 m), are certainly put as "the time", in an only
"virtual and imaginary" section (of our mind), to place after the
presence and to really scatter (all what exists only simultaneously)
in the light's time perception of the time-present mass. We have the
PROOFS, of this system to act of our intelligence, to live a life
having same duration and not... all together. It's necessary the
scattered time in every "music".
SO THIS IS OUR THESIS.
In E = mc^2 the lack of Unification depends on the "lack of purity" :
1) about the "Absolute" speed of the electromagnetic volume; 2) about
the Atomic Forces of its masses. The first isn't "pure" in a
"measured" speed, but it is the linear definition of the mass
"present" in a volume, indirectly already assumed with 1 m and 1 kg
related to the Earth mass. The second is the "Force of the mass" and
not the "Moment of its Force", that today is exchanged for a "pure"
Force.
AN THIS IS OUR SYNTHESIS
PURIFICATION OF THE c^2. The "absolute" speed of the electromagnetism
was indirectly fixed in 3×10^8 m/s BY DEFINITION, when 1 m was defined
as the 10^-7 of 1/4 of the Earth Meridian, and as the cycle of 10
decimal unitary masses put in sequence. In that precise moment the
space of 3/4 of the Meridian's length was 3×10^7 m long, and the 10
cycle of this present mass was necessarily of 3×10^8 m/s. Since the
unit in the SI is the 10 cycle, this absolute speed isn't 3/1 m/s (but
10^8 times bigger) only by the m imposed as 10^-8 of the cycle of the
unitary mass. When there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, the
c^2 measured with this m is necessarily the absolute 9 m^2 s^-2 that
must be ×10^16 times... because the m dimension's definition!
PURIFICATION OF THE ATOMIC MASS. Again according to the initial
definitions, when m 1/10 is the length of the side of the unitary mass
of 1 dm^3 of water, and its unitary cycle is that of the 10 dm of 1 m,
the most fall of 1 dm^3 of water (occupying 1 dm in height in the 10
dm of its dynamic cycle in height) is certainly of 9 dm, and certainly
the energy is 9 (as how 9 kg fallen of 1, as how 1 kg fallen of 9). It
is correct, having the same number 9 of the energy of the absolute
expansion 9, were there is equivalence between energy and mass.
Therefore, when there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, 9 is the
most unitary free energy, or the most free mass. Since 9,109389754
×10^-31 kg is the unitary mass of the free electron, and 9,109389754
is more than 9, it isn't the PURE FORCE of the mass, but probably it
is the Moment of its Force. How 60° measured to the Sun aren't the
Sun's Temperature (since the incidence of the space)... so 9,109389754
×10^-31 kg isn't the electron mass (since the incidence of the atomic
space). The space/time acts as in the macro, as in the micro of the
dimension. If the result of a balancing shows always this "moment", it
is always a "moment" and never becomes a "pure" Force.
Purifying the Forces of the masses, we have seen how all the physical
constants, at the same dimensions, assume the worthies of pure ratios,
in their number.
(Only for example: c is 3/1=3; c^2 is 3×3=9; Planck constant is 400/
(3+3)=66.6666...; Plank mass is 3×7=21; Planck time is (3×3)×(3+3)=54;
a.m.u. is 100/(3+3)=16.666...; electron mass in kg is 3×3=9; electron
mass in a.m.u. is 0.009/(16.6666...)=0.00054, or 540 (the candela's
number)/10^6=0.00054; electron mass in MeV is 54 -2(of MeV front)=52;
electron corpuscle in a.m.u. is 0,00054/3=0,00018; electron radius is
54/18=3; electron Volt and electric charge are 2^4=16; Avogadro's
number is 6=the Log of (10^10):(10^4); fine structure is the Log of
(10^100)×[10^-(3^3)]=73; Boltzman constant is (10^4)/
(73-1)=138.8888...; molar constant of gasses is 100/12=8,3333...;
Rydberg constant is 10/(0,90 periodic)=11, molar volume of an ideal
gas is 10/(0.45 periodic)=22, Faraday constant is (2^4)^6=96, etc.)..
THIS WILL SOON OPEN TO ATOMIC FUSION. Cut away in all the atomic
masses what today is only the "Moment of the Force", and obtained the
PURITY of the FORCES, finally the Physics is unified an can do the
perfect calculus of the Forces to UNIFY also two hydrogen's atoms.
Finally it'll be possible until the real calculus of the true Force
(of magnetism and pressure) to compel - by magnetism - the lining up
of all the rotation's axes of the electron orbital planes, and - by
pressure - the penetration of two orbital planes made relatively
motionless because rotating- Nascondi testo citato
- Mostra testo citato...
leggi tutto
|
Every student of the Physycs must pay really the greatest attention. I
also believe that the difficulty to UNIFY the PHYSCS is only depending
on the REAL ADOPPTION of 2 differents UNITS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
well
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 10:23 am Post subject: Re: The "purification" in the E=mc^2 will bring to c^2=9, an |
|
|
On 9 Lug, 14:02, amoram <ra.amo...@libero.it> wrote:
| Quote: |
Dear attentive scientist, keen on the Physics Research,
any who
searches gold, is glad when finds a pure sign of gold in a immense
river... The gold that the New Italic School of Epistemology,
searching and purifying the physical matter, has found, is even the
PHYSICS UNIFICATION.
Now I really hope that you don't throw away - suddenly - all this
river of our researches, only for distrust or... as soon as you'll
believe that its sand is not "all made of gold"... if you really
search a new start for yourselves!
The Purified Physics will soon allow the perfect calculus of the 2
necessary Forces (of magnetism and pressure) to realize the Atomic
Fusion.
Please, let you read! If you don't believe that our result was
possible, let you search in it at least a new starting for your
research!
The N.I.S. needs it at most, because nobody knows its work, and asks
modestly the help for reaching together this goal
A new start for your researches can happen, already, simply "noting
the lack of purity" existing today in the application of the
Einstein's General Relativity.
While Einstein needed an "absolute" speed as c in E = mc^2..., and
while by "pure" Principle the "absolute" in Physics is what is "not
dependent on - or relative to - anything else"..., the "light speed"
hasn't this "absolute" condition... if Physics respects this "pure"
Principe about "its absolute". In fact it is dependent on - and
relative to - the real electromagnetic front, that speed being
certainly of a flow of a volume... but this front, or section, is
lacking!
If Physics respects the "purity" in E=mc^2, how could m (a mass that
has its volume) be accelerated... not how a speed of "volume"? The
"pure" light speed isn't speed of volume lacking its electromagnetic
front! In our N.I.S. calculations, its 299 792 458 m s^-1 results to
be, at 10^-8 m^2 unitary dimension, the movement of the front big
1.0006922855944561487267301434248, for 1 m^3 s^-1 of flow, flow of the
"pure" its existence... and the speed in line is clearly of 3/1 m
s^-1, when it is "flow of volume", and not only the "undefined" speed
299 792 458 m s^-1, even if it is always invariant!
In Mathematics an "absolute" quantity hasn't the algebraic sign of a
Vector of real speed, so also in Mathematics the 299 792 458 m/s in a
direction, of the light speed, isn't an "absolute" mathematical
quantity, if Physics respects the mathematical "purity" in the D.M.S.
(decimal metric system) of the SI units. If the "purity" imposes the
volume's flow, 3 m^3 s^-1 is a "pure" math quantity of existence,
divided in 1 s of duration, and it is not a vector!
The SI units have the 10 cycle as the common unit of its decimal
units, so its "only invariant number" is 9, if the Physics respects
the "purity" of the D.M.S. of the SI. Its "purity" shows the 1 mass
falling of 9, or the 9 energy falling of 1. 1 and 9 are reciprocal
numbers, in the cycle 10. 1+9=10, or 10-9=1. The first expands 1 to 10
through +9 spaces, the second amasses 10 in 1 through -9 spaces. +9 an
-9 are all the "imposed" movement's energies, "imposed as fundament"
by the D.M.S. of the SI units.
The lack of UNIFICATION - finally - seems the lack of "purity"
consisting just in the "violation" of this 9 invariant number of the
D.M.S., when are adopted, at its "due" place, 2 different numbers of
units... in the same electromagnetism: A) 8.98755... in 10^16 m^2 s^-2
for the expanded c^2 mass B) 9,10938754 in 10^-31 kg for the amassed
electron's mass..., where the "purity" imposes that a "number of mass"
is not dependent on its form: diffused or amassed. Afterwards, adopted
involuntarily 2 different "numbers", - strangely - it is more than 100
years that the Physics asks in vain "why" there is not unity! And it
tries an "impossible" real connection between the forces! It is
impossible to reach, when we have introduced 2 "inverse mistakes",
introducing not "pure Forces", but 2 different "space/time Moments":
one negative in the full light expansion (what lacks to 3, in
2.99792...), and one positive in the full amassing of the light (what
is more than 9, in the 9.198389754 of the electron).
It is a question of "purity" that the "unit" represents everything.
So, being 1 m^3 the unit of the volume, amassed in 3 directions, it is
3 m^3 simultaneously amassed in 1, that are passing in the existence's
time as 3 m^3 s^-1, having the speed in line of 3 m s^-1, that becomes
exactly the "absolute" 3×10^8 m s^-1 when the section is of 10^-8 m^2
(that unitary of the candela, the unitary intensity of the light of
the SI). So only the "ideal purity" approaches the "know-how", and we
understand because, in s^-1, we don't perceive 300 000 000 m, but 299
792 458 m.
We have a front wider than the Å^2 10^12 = m^2 10^-8 of the candela;
the real front is 1.000692285594...×10^-8 m^2. There is certainly a
space/time Moment (equal to the precise part exceeding 1 candela),
that gets in "properly" the "moment's worth", that is the "real
duration" of our perceived "moment of space-time". The lacking 207.542
m (in 300 000 000 m), are certainly put as "the time", in an only
"virtual and imaginary" section (of our mind), to place after the
presence and to really scatter (all what exists only simultaneously)
in the light's time perception of the time-present mass. We have the
PROOFS, of this system to act of our intelligence, to live a life
having same duration and not... all together. It's necessary the
scattered time in every "music".
SO THIS IS OUR THESIS.
In E = mc^2 the lack of Unification depends on the "lack of purity" :
1) about the "Absolute" speed of the electromagnetic volume; 2) about
the Atomic Forces of its masses. The first isn't "pure" in a
"measured" speed, but it is the linear definition of the mass
"present" in a volume, indirectly already assumed with 1 m and 1 kg
related to the Earth mass. The second is the "Force of the mass" and
not the "Moment of its Force", that today is exchanged for a "pure"
Force.
AN THIS IS OUR SYNTHESIS
PURIFICATION OF THE c^2. The "absolute" speed of the electromagnetism
was indirectly fixed in 3×10^8 m/s BY DEFINITION, when 1 m was defined
as the 10^-7 of 1/4 of the Earth Meridian, and as the cycle of 10
decimal unitary masses put in sequence. In that precise moment the
space of 3/4 of the Meridian's length was 3×10^7 m long, and the 10
cycle of this present mass was necessarily of 3×10^8 m/s. Since the
unit in the SI is the 10 cycle, this absolute speed isn't 3/1 m/s (but
10^8 times bigger) only by the m imposed as 10^-8 of the cycle of the
unitary mass. When there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, the
c^2 measured with this m is necessarily the absolute 9 m^2 s^-2 that
must be ×10^16 times... because the m dimension's definition!
PURIFICATION OF THE ATOMIC MASS. Again according to the initial
definitions, when m 1/10 is the length of the side of the unitary mass
of 1 dm^3 of water, and its unitary cycle is that of the 10 dm of 1 m,
the most fall of 1 dm^3 of water (occupying 1 dm in height in the 10
dm of its dynamic cycle in height) is certainly of 9 dm, and certainly
the energy is 9 (as how 9 kg fallen of 1, as how 1 kg fallen of 9). It
is correct, having the same number 9 of the energy of the absolute
expansion 9, were there is equivalence between energy and mass.
Therefore, when there is the PURE RESPECT for the Principles, 9 is the
most unitary free energy, or the most free mass. Since 9,109389754
×10^- | | | |
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
