Physics Talk
Physics Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Education Forums
Experimental tests of "relativity".

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Physics Talk Forum Index -> Relativity
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Wed Jul 16, 2008 8:31 pm    Post subject: Experimental tests of "relativity". Reply with quote

On Jul 15, 10:51 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
Quote:
gl...@aol.com wrote:
The experiments test the validity of the
Lorentz Transformation EQUATIONS; not the
THEORY of Einstein.

Nonsense. You need to learn what science >actually is.
Tom Roberts
Evidently Tom doesn't know the difference between science and

physics.
Science seeks to understand the physical world. Physics only tries
to measure various aspects of it, even though it doesn't understand
what it is measuring.
Perhaps that's why Mr. Roberts (a physicist rather than a scientist)
doesn't know the difference between an experiment that tests the
validity of an equation compared to one that tests the validity of a
theory; especially when (unknown by him) the equations deny the
validity of that theory.

Dr. G. I Lebau (glird)
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Androcles
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 1:59 am    Post subject: Re: Experimental tests of "relativity". Reply with quote

<glird@aol.com> wrote in message
news:05e17c42-bdab-4418-9861-b6e0e0df49c4@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
| On Jul 15, 10:51 am, Tom Roberts <tjroberts...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
| > gl...@aol.com wrote:
| > > The experiments test the validity of the
| > >Lorentz Transformation EQUATIONS; not the
| > >THEORY of Einstein.
| >
| > Nonsense. You need to learn what science >actually is.
| > Tom Roberts
| Evidently Tom doesn't know the difference between science and
| physics.
| Science seeks to understand the physical world. Physics only tries
| to measure various aspects of it, even though it doesn't understand
| what it is measuring.
| Perhaps that's why Mr. Roberts (a physicist rather than a scientist)
| doesn't know the difference between an experiment that tests the
| validity of an equation compared to one that tests the validity of a
| theory; especially when (unknown by him) the equations deny the
| validity of that theory.
|
| Dr. G. I Lebau (glird)

Roberts is as crazy as Hammond.
Where Hammond believes in his god (a figment of the imagination passed on
from generation to generation) Roberts believes in black holes (a figment of
the imagination passed on from generation to generation). There is no
actual evidence for either, but each will manufacture the facts needed to
fit their respective theories.
Science is the observation, investigation and explanation of natural
phenomena,
in that order. Black holes, dragons, aether and gods are explanations
without
observations. Only a fool goes looking for them.
Dr. J. Parker (Androcles)
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Physics Talk Forum Index -> Relativity All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Australian Debt Consolidation Experts
medical insurance
Wedding
Search Escorts and girls (incall/OutCall) online with Oasi2000, ItaliaChiamami, BestAnnunci...
Australia Swingers Contacts
Google SEO Talk
Secured Loans
Make Your Own Website
Free and Cheap International Calls
Long island Cleaning service
black mold
UK Swingers Genuine Contacts Site
floor machines
bissell Parts



Board Security

93 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group